Oscar night with Jimmy Kimmel and I’m
more excited about this year’s celebration than I have been for a long time,
not just for the winners but also for whatever Kimmel and the winners might say
about the #MeToo movement and our leader Donald Trump. I’m guessing that Kimmel
may take it easy of the Donald but there will be plenty of others who take a
shot or two. I haven’t been able to see all the films up for consideration so
my choices are a bit skewed.
First, the movies. I have to dismiss
some because they just didn’t fit my eye. Dunkirk
may have been interesting and cinematically awesome but I didn’t see anything
that made it memorable. Get Out got
much praise for its take on the horror genre and Daniel Kaluuya’s acting as the
black victim of a white plot to steal his manhood and a portion of his brain. I
enjoyed the tension but I couldn’t accept the false premises on which it was
based, the hypnosis bit and the brain surgery. Same thing with Greta Gerwig’s Lady Bird. I loved Soirse Ronan’s
portrayal of teenage angst (Why doesn’t she just give in and spell it Sirshu?)
but the film portrayed high school and teenagers in a way I just don’t
understand. Too old, I guess. That leaves me with no opinion of five of the
nominees, of which I most regret not seeing The
Shape of Water. I would have to pick Three
Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri and one that didn’t even make it to the
best nine, The Big Sick, as the two
best movies of 2017. Both had great stories, interesting characters, and great
acting. The Big Sick had additional
humor and drama and should have been one of the nine nominated. It also had Ray
Romano and Holly Hunter who should have been nominated for best supporting
roles.
What about the acting categories? First,
I still don’t know what distinguishes a lead role from a supporting role. Is it
based on the importance of the role to the overall story? Or is it based on the
number of minutes on camera? I shrug my shoulders. In either category, what
kinds of roles are more likely to win? It seems like eccentricity or physical
transformation proves the difference, especially for best lead roles. Just look
at some of the winners in the last 15 years. Actors: Eddie Redmayne as Stephen
Hawking, Jamie Foxx as Ray Charles, Colin Firth as King George VI, Daniel Day
Lewis as Lincoln, and especially Philip Seymour Hoffman as Truman Capote.
Actresses: Julianne Moore with Alzheimer’s in Still Alice, Meryl Streep as Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher, Helen
Mirren as Queen Elizabeth II, Hillary Swank as a boxer in Million Dollar Baby, and beautiful Charlize Theron as the truly
unbeautiful Monster in 2004. So, the greater the division of actor or actress
to the character portrayed, the better the chances of winning. Where does that
leave this year’s actresses? The best shots must be for Sally Hawkins as the
mute lover of her Black Lagoonish monster and Margot Robbie as the
semi-monterish Tonya Harding. But who will win? That’s a shoe-in for Frances
McDormand as the Three Billboards
mother and Gary Oldman’s Churchill. Best supporting actors and actresses?
Allison Janney as the monstrous mother in I,
Tonya and either Woody Harrelson or Sam Rockwell for their great portrayals
in Billboards. Okay, let the contest begin.
No comments:
Post a Comment